# What Are The Advantages Of Payback Period?

## What does a negative payback period mean?

The length of time necessary for a payback period on an investment is something to strongly consider before embarking upon a project – because the longer this period happens to be, the longer this money is “lost” and the more it negatively it affects cash flow until the project breaks even, or begins to turn a profit..

## How do I calculate payback period?

The formula for computing payback period with even cashflows is:Pay back period =Total outflows Initial investment.__________ or _______________Inflow every year Net annual cash inflows.

## What is difference between NPV and IRR?

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. By contrast, the internal rate of return (IRR) is a calculation used to estimate the profitability of potential investments.

## What are the weaknesses of the payback method?

Although this method is useful for managers concerned about cash flow, the major weaknesses of this method are that it ignores the time value of money, and it ignores cash flows after the payback period.

## Why is an investment more attractive to management if it has a shorter payback period?

It is a simple way to evaluate the risk associated with a proposed project. An investment with a shorter payback period is considered to be better, since the investor’s initial outlay is at risk for a shorter period of time. The calculation used to derive the payback period is called the payback method.

## What is considered a good payback period?

The shortest payback period is generally considered to be the most acceptable. This is a particularly good rule to follow when a company is deciding between one or more projects or investments. The reason being, the longer the money is tied up, the less opportunity there is to invest it elsewhere.

## What is pay back period method?

The payback period disregards the time value of money. It is determined by counting the number of years it takes to recover the funds invested. For example, if it takes five years to recover the cost of an investment, the payback period is five years. Some analysts favor the payback method for its simplicity.

## Which is better NPV or payback?

NPV is the best single measure of profitability. Payback vs NPV ignores any benefits that occur after the payback period. … While NPV measures the total dollar value of project benefits. NPV, payback period fully considered, is the better way to compare with different investment projects.

## Why do many corporations continue to use the payback period method?

Payback periods are typically used when liquidity presents a major concern. If a company only has a limited amount of funds, they might be able to only undertake one major project at a time. Therefore, management will heavily focus on recovering their initial investment in order to undertake subsequent projects.

## Why is the payback period often criticized?

Most companies use payback period in capital budgeting though it is often criticized lack of the concept of time value of money. … In addition, payback is related to the duration of future cash flows so it serves as a good proxy to describe liquidity and risk when cash flows are constant.

## Why is NPV better than IRR?

The advantage to using the NPV method over IRR using the example above is that NPV can handle multiple discount rates without any problems. Each year’s cash flow can be discounted separately from the others making NPV the better method.

## Why is payback period inferior to NPV?

The payback period method has some key weaknesses that the NPV method does not. One is that the payback method doesn’t take into account inflation and the cost of capital. … Another is that the payback method ignores all cash flows beyond the time horizon – and those cash flows may be substantial.

## Is NPV the best method?

The NPV method will always lead to a singular correct accept-or-reject decision. In conclusion, NPV is a better method for evaluating mutually exclusive projects than the IRR method.